The history of the world is riddled with violence directly related to religious issues or differences. Modern society is more tolerant and religious freedom is advocated in most parts of the world. Yet there remain many churches and sects that seem to attract severe criticism and sanction. Those that want the HOPCC exposed, for example, are vehement in their efforts to discredit the church.
Critics of the House of Prayer Christian Church are very serious about the complaints about the church. They have special Facebook and Twitter sites to voice and publish their criticism and there are several websites dedicated to exposing the alleged wrongs and travesties of the church. From reading the many criticisms and complaints it is clear that many of those critics were one time members of the House of Prayer.
One of the main criticisms against the House of Prayer is that they recruit members with false promises and outright lies. Detractors say that prospective members are promised that the church will look after them in all ways and that members are focused on helping each other. Members are also told that the teachings of the church are evangelical in nature and that it is based upon the gospels.
Another major point of contention seems to be the methods used by the church to convince members to make donations to the church. Members are told that those with plenty need to help those with little. In reality, critics allege, only favoured members benefit. Some members have given up their homes and even their jobs in order to spend more time in achieving the goals of the church.
Critics are also very vocal about the fact that the church seems to target young people. Some parents allege that their children have been turned against their own families. They say that the House of Prayer convinces young members that they need to shun their families and accept the church as their only family if they wish to attain salvation. Some parents even say that their children exhibits disturbing behavioural traits.
There are also allegations that the church uses its seminary to indoctrinate both the students and the staff. The church states, on its own website, that the students and staff are encouraged to shun all worldly matters and to concentrate only upon the mission of the church and their own spiritual growth. Detractors say that this is proof that the church tries to alienate members from the societies in which they live.
To the frustration of enemies of the House of Prayer efforts to get various authorities to launch investigations into the affairs of the church have been fruitless. Several authorities have declined to investigate, saying that the church is not breaking any laws and that there are no indications that crimes are committed. Individual cases, such as when the parents of under age children complain will be followed up, however.
The House of Prayer Christian Church has not answered allegations against it formally. The have published a number of letters and testimonials on their website, all very positive and full of praise for the work the church has done. The church denies that it does not allow members to own assets or that they require members to donate their assets to the church.
Critics of the House of Prayer Christian Church are very serious about the complaints about the church. They have special Facebook and Twitter sites to voice and publish their criticism and there are several websites dedicated to exposing the alleged wrongs and travesties of the church. From reading the many criticisms and complaints it is clear that many of those critics were one time members of the House of Prayer.
One of the main criticisms against the House of Prayer is that they recruit members with false promises and outright lies. Detractors say that prospective members are promised that the church will look after them in all ways and that members are focused on helping each other. Members are also told that the teachings of the church are evangelical in nature and that it is based upon the gospels.
Another major point of contention seems to be the methods used by the church to convince members to make donations to the church. Members are told that those with plenty need to help those with little. In reality, critics allege, only favoured members benefit. Some members have given up their homes and even their jobs in order to spend more time in achieving the goals of the church.
Critics are also very vocal about the fact that the church seems to target young people. Some parents allege that their children have been turned against their own families. They say that the House of Prayer convinces young members that they need to shun their families and accept the church as their only family if they wish to attain salvation. Some parents even say that their children exhibits disturbing behavioural traits.
There are also allegations that the church uses its seminary to indoctrinate both the students and the staff. The church states, on its own website, that the students and staff are encouraged to shun all worldly matters and to concentrate only upon the mission of the church and their own spiritual growth. Detractors say that this is proof that the church tries to alienate members from the societies in which they live.
To the frustration of enemies of the House of Prayer efforts to get various authorities to launch investigations into the affairs of the church have been fruitless. Several authorities have declined to investigate, saying that the church is not breaking any laws and that there are no indications that crimes are committed. Individual cases, such as when the parents of under age children complain will be followed up, however.
The House of Prayer Christian Church has not answered allegations against it formally. The have published a number of letters and testimonials on their website, all very positive and full of praise for the work the church has done. The church denies that it does not allow members to own assets or that they require members to donate their assets to the church.